Himanshu Soni is an Advocate enrolled with the Bar Council of Delhi, Enrolment No. D/11134/2026. This website is maintained for informational purposes only.
The contents of this website do not constitute legal advice, solicitation, invitation, or advertisement of any kind, and are not intended to induce any person to engage the services of Mayach & Co. or Himanshu Soni. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice, and no lawyer–client relationship is created by accessing or using this website.
By clicking I Agree, you confirm that you are accessing this website of your own accord, for informational purposes only, and that there has been no solicitation, invitation, or inducement of any sort by Mayach & Co. or any of its members to create a lawyer–client relationship through this website.
New Zealand is a notified reciprocating territory under Section 44A CPC, but is also a Hague Child Abduction Convention signatory while India is not — creating an unusual mismatch in how money decrees and custody orders are each treated. This page covers the Indian law dimension of matters with a New Zealand connection.
New Zealand has a long-standing Indian diaspora and growing skilled-migration and student ties with India. Unlike Australia, New Zealand is notified as a reciprocating territory under Section 44A CPC, so money decrees can be executed directly in India. But on family law, New Zealand's no-fault divorce regime and its status as a Hague Convention signatory — a convention India has not joined — create real friction points for Hindu couples and for cross-border custody disputes. This page covers the Indian law dimension of matters with a New Zealand connection.