This website is maintained for informational purposes only. The author is a law student at Law Centre-1, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi and is not currently enrolled with any State Bar Council.
Nothing on this website constitutes legal advice, solicitation, or advertisement. Accessing this website does not create a lawyer–client relationship.
By clicking I Agree, you confirm that you are accessing this website voluntarily for informational purposes only.
New Zealand is a notified reciprocating territory under Section 44A CPC, but is also a Hague Child Abduction Convention signatory while India is not — creating an unusual mismatch in how money decrees and custody orders are each treated. This page covers the Indian law dimension of matters with a New Zealand connection.
New Zealand has a long-standing Indian diaspora and growing skilled-migration and student ties with India. Unlike Australia, New Zealand is notified as a reciprocating territory under Section 44A CPC, so money decrees can be executed directly in India. But on family law, New Zealand's no-fault divorce regime and its status as a Hague Convention signatory — a convention India has not joined — create real friction points for Hindu couples and for cross-border custody disputes. This page covers the Indian law dimension of matters with a New Zealand connection.
We respond to all initial enquiries within 24 hours.